The Income Tax Department has introduced a new profession code (16021) — “Social Media Influencers” — in ITR-3 and ITR-4 for AY 2025-26.

At first glance, this feels like recognition of content creation as a legitimate profession. But as a CA working with creators, I can tell you: it has opened up more confusion than clarity.

Let’s break it down.

⚖️ The Core Issue with Profession Code 16021

Legal Grey Area

• Influencers are now a separate profession category in the ITR.
• But under Rule 6F of Section 44AA(1), “social media influencer” is not explicitly listed.
• This means there is a regulatory gap — the label exists, but the legal foundation is shaky.

Tax Rate Impact

• Until now, many creators filed under Section 44AD → presumptive taxation at 6% of digital receipts (or 8% if non-digital).
• Under profession code 16021, influencers could be pushed into Section 44ADA → where 50% of gross receipts are deemed profit.
• That’s a huge jump in taxable income for many creators.

Compliance Burden

• Being treated as a “professional” means:
  • Audit threshold at ₹75 lakh (not ₹2 crore like businesses under 44AD)
  • If gross receipts > ₹10 lakh, mandatory books of accounts must be maintained
• This increases compliance costs and complexity.

🛠️ Practical Options for Creators

There is still no official circular or notification forcing a shift to Section 44ADA. Based on current law, here’s how creators are approaching it:

Option 1: Continue with ITR-4 under Section 44AD

• Presumptive taxation at 6% (digital) or 8% (non-digital)
• Lower compliance burden → no need for detailed books under ₹2 crore turnover
• A legally defensible position until official clarification is issued

Option 2: Switch to ITR-3 (For Larger Creators)

• File under actual profit & loss instead of presumptive tax
• Best suited for creators with gross receipts > ₹75 lakh
• Higher compliance costs (books, audit, CA assistance)
• But gives more control over taxable income by claiming expenses (equipment, internet, rent, team salaries, etc.)

💡 Many mid-range creators (₹10L–₹75L receipts) are in the toughest spot — the uncertainty creates real risk of overpaying taxes if handled incorrectly.

✅ Immediate Steps Every Influencer Should Take

As of now, the safest approach is caution + record keeping. Here’s what I’m advising my clients:

Maintain Complete Records

• Bank statements
• Brand invoices & contracts
• Expense proofs (camera, software, rent, internet, travel, team payments)

Reconcile AIS & Form 26AS

• Cross-check your Annual Information Statement with your actual receipts
• Address mismatches early (many brands delay TDS filing, creating mismatches for creators)

Assess Your Situation

• Small creators (<₹10 lakh receipts) → still low compliance burden
• Mid-range creators (₹10L–₹75L) → most affected by code 16021 uncertainty
• Large creators (>₹75L) → should prepare for detailed books + audit anyway

Don’t Rush Filing

• Wait for clarity or expert advice before filing ITR
• Premature filing under the wrong section can lock you into higher taxes or trigger notices later

👀 What we're observing among clients

Working with a wide range of influencers, I’m seeing patterns:

• Creators between ₹10–₹75 lakh receipts are most impacted
• Delayed brand payments are complicating TDS claims and cash flow planning
• Worries about retrospective application — could authorities reclassify past years? (unlikely, but concern exists)
• Some creators are considering moving to actual books of accounts earlier than needed, just to avoid ambiguity

📊 Section 44AD vs 44ADA for Influencers: Key Comparison

Aspect Section 44AD (Business) Section 44ADA (Profession) Who Can Use Small businesses, digital freelancers Professionals (CA, lawyer, doctor, influencer under 16021?) Presumptive Income % 6% (digital) / 8% (non-digital) 50% of gross receipts Turnover Limit ₹2 crore ₹75 lakh Audit Requirement Above ₹2 crore Above ₹75 lakh Books of Accounts Not mandatory under presumptive Mandatory if receipts > ₹10 lakh Impact for Influencers Lower tax, less compliance Higher tax, heavier compliance

💡 Unless explicitly mandated, many creators will continue to prefer 44AD for now.

🚀 Bottom Line

Profession code 16021 for influencers is a double-edged sword. On paper, it acknowledges content creation as a profession. In practice, it risks:

• Higher tax liability
• More compliance costs
• Greater confusion among small and mid-range creators

As of AY 2025-26, here’s the safe path:

• Keep detailed financial records
• Don’t rush your ITR filing decisions
• Consult a CA before switching from 44AD to 44ADA
• Stay updated, as the CBDT may issue clarifications before filing deadlines

👉 Recognition is welcome. But unless implemented with clarity, it may hurt creators more than it helps.

🔍 You're in the right place, if you're searching for,

• profession code 16021 influencers
• influencer tax rules India AY 2025-26
• new ITR code for creators India
• 44AD vs 44ADA for influencers
• ITR for social media influencers India
• influencer income tax compliance India